European parliament starts discussing the proposed Directive on collective management of copyright Posted onApril 29, 2013 <http://www.communia-association.org/2013/04/29/european-parliament-starts-discussing-the-proposed-directive-on-collective-management-of-copyright/>byPaul Keller <http://www.communia-association.org/author/pkeller/> The European Commission'sProposal for a directive on collective management of copyright and related rights and multi-territorial licensing of rights in musical works for online uses in the internal market <http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0372/COM_COM%282012%290372_EN.pdf>isslowly progressing <http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/ficheprocedure.do?reference=2012/0180%28COD%29&l=en#keyEvents>through the legislative process in Brussels. As part of this no less then five committees of the European Parliament (Legal Affairs, Culture and Education, Industry, Research and Energy, Internal Market and Consumer Protection and International Trade) are in the process of forming their opinion on the proposal. At this stagethe draft opinions written by the rapporteurs for the four non-leading committees have been published <http://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/draft-opinions.html?linkedDocume...>. These opinions take the form of amendments proposed to the text of the directive (sometimes these are accompanied by short justifications). In ourpolicy paper from January <http://www.communia-association.org/2013/01/07/communia-policy-paper-on-proposed-directive-on-collective-management-of-copyright/>we identified two main issues with the proposed directive: The first one concerns the transparency of repertoire information that has to be provided by collective management organisations and the second concerns the relation between collective management and open content licenses. In our analysis the proposed directive fails to sufficiently address these two issues. We are happy to see that among the four published opinions thedraft opinion of the Committee on Culture and Education <http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-%2f%2fEP%2f%2fNONSGML%2bCOMPARL%2bPE-508.071%2b01%2bDOC%2bPDF%2bV0%2f%2fEN>authored byHelga Trüpel <https://memopol.lqdn.fr/europe/parliament/deputy/HelgaTrupel/#profile>shares the concerns voiced in our policy paper. In the introduction of the document she writes: The Rapporteur would like to stress that rightholders should have the possibility to make their works available under an open content license of their choice, for instance under Creative Commons, without necessarily opting out from the collective management system. Furthermore, the Rapporteur would like to give even more flexibility to rightholders in the management of the rights. CMOs should provide accurate repertory information, in particular for works falling into the Public Domain. CMOs should ensure that the information in respect of the works whose term of protection terminates is accurate and regularly updated, in order to exempt such works from licensing and avoid claims to be enforced by CMOs in that regard. In the following we take a closer look at the relevant amendments contained in the draft opinion of the Committee on Culture and Education: [...] Continua qui: http://www.communia-association.org/2013/04/29/european-parliament-starts-di...