[Scusate, la mail partita accidentalmente...] Despite considering myself a cryptographer, I have not found myself particularly drawn to “crypto.” I don’t think I’ve ever actually said the words “get off my lawn,” but I’m much more likely to click on Pepperidge Farm Remembers flavored memes about how “crypto” used to mean “cryptography” than I am the latest NFT drop. Also – cards on the table here – I don’t share the same generational excitement for moving all aspects of life into an instrumented economy. Even strictly on the technological level, though, I haven’t yet managed to become a believer. So given all of the recent attention into what is now being called web3, I decided to explore some of what has been happening in that space more thoroughly to see what I may be missing. [...] It’s probably good to have some clarity on why centralized platforms emerged to begin with, and in my mind the explanation is pretty simple: 1. People don’t want to run their own servers, and never will. [...] 2. A protocol moves much more slowly than a platform. [...] But web3 intends to be different, so let’s take a look. In order to get a quick feeling for the space and a better understanding for what the future may hold, I decided to build a couple of dApps and create an NFT. # Making some distributed apps To get a feeling for the web3 world, I made a dApp called Autonomous Art that lets anyone mint a token for an NFT by making a visual contribution to it. The cost of making a visual contribution increases over time, and the funds a contributor pays to mint are distributed to all previous artists (visualizing this financial structure would resemble something similar to a pyramid shape). At the time of this writing, over $38k USD has gone into creating this collective art piece. I also made a dApp called First Derivative that allows you to create, discover, and exchange NFT derivatives which track an underlying NFT, similar to financial derivatives which track an underlying asset ;-) [...] whether it’s running on mobile or the web, a dApp like Autonomous Art or First Derivative needs to interact with the blockchain somehow [...] That’s not really possible to do from the client, though, since the blockchain can’t live on your mobile device (or in your desktop browser realistically). So the only alternative is to interact with the blockchain via a node that’s running remotely on a server somewhere. A server! But, as we know, people don’t want to run their own servers. As it happens, companies have emerged that sell API access to an ethereum node they run as a service [...] Almost all dApps use either Infura or Alchemy in order to interact with the blockchain. In fact, even when you connect a wallet like MetaMask to a dApp, and the dApp interacts with the blockchain via your wallet, MetaMask is just making calls to Infura! These client APIs are not using anything to verify blockchain state or the authenticity of responses. The results aren’t even signed. An app like Autonomous Art says “hey what’s the output of this view function on this smart contract,” Alchemy or Infura responds with a JSON blob that says “this is the output,” and the app renders it. This was surprising to me. So much work, energy, and time has gone into creating a trustless distributed consensus mechanism, but virtually all clients that wish to access it do so by simply trusting the outputs from these two companies without any further verification. # Making an NFT I also wanted to create a more traditional NFT. Most people think of images and digital art when they think of NFTs, but NFTs generally do not store that data on-chain. For most NFTs of most images, that would be much too expensive. Instead of storing the data on-chain, NFTs instead contain a URL that points to the data. [...] Anyone with access to that machine, anyone who buys that domain name in the future, or anyone who compromises that machine can change the image, title, description, etc for the NFT to whatever they’d like at any time (regardless of whether or not they “own” the token). So as an experiment, I made an NFT that changes based on who is looking at it, since the web server that serves the image can choose to serve different images based on the IP or User Agent of the requester. For example, it looked one way on OpenSea, another way on Rarible, but when you buy it and view it from your crypto wallet, it will always display as a large [SMILING-SHIT] emoji. There’s nothing unusual about this NFT, it’s how the NFT specifications are built. Many of the highest priced NFTs could turn into [SMILING-SHIT] emoji at any time; I just made it explicit. After a few days, without warning or explanation, the NFT I made was removed from OpenSea (an NFT marketplace) [...] The takedown suggests that I violated some Term Of Service, but after reading the terms, I don’t see any that prohibit an NFT which changes based on where it is being looked at from, and I was openly describing it that way. What I found most interesting, though, is that after OpenSea removed my NFT, it also no longer appeared in any crypto wallet on my device. This is web3, though, how is that possible? [...] if your NFT is removed from OpenSea, it also disappears from your wallet. It doesn’t functionally matter that my NFT is indelibly on the blockchain somewhere, because the wallet (and increasingly everything else in the ecosystem) is just using the OpenSea API to display NFTs, which began returning 304 No Content for the query of NFTs owned by my address! # It’s early days “It’s early days still” is the most common refrain I see from people in the web3 space when discussing matters like these. In some ways, cryptocurrency’s failure to scale beyond relatively nascent engineering is what makes it possible to consider the days “early,” since objectively it has already been a decade or more. [...] # But you can’t stop a gold rush When you think about it, OpenSea would actually be much “better” in the immediate sense if all the web3 parts were gone. It would be faster, cheaper for everyone, and easier to use. [...] However, if they had built a platform to buy and sell images that wasn’t nominally based on crypto, I don’t think it would have taken off [...] because this is a gold rush. [...] At the end of the stack, NFT artists are excited about this kind of progression because it means more speculation/investment in their art [...] # Creativity might not be enough If we do want to change our relationship to technology, I think we’d have to do it intentionally. My basic thoughts are roughly: We should accept the premise that people will not run their own servers by designing systems that can distribute trust without having to distribute infrastructure. 1. We should accept the premise that people will not run their own servers by designing systems that can distribute trust without having to distribute infrastructure. [...] 2. We should try to reduce the burden of building software. [...] ____ Tratto da https://moxie.org/2022/01/07/web3-first-impressions.html Per i pochi che non lo sapessero, Moxie Marlinspike è il creatore di Signal, piattaforma di comunicazione cifrata end-to-end che io NON consiglio (perché centralizzata, basata sui TPM lato server etc...). Della sua analisi ho riportato qui i punti salienti, pur non condividendo affatto una delle assunzioni (interessata) di Moxie: moltissime persone VOGLIONO il controllo sui propri server e l'evoluzione del software libero così come la LENTISSIMA diffusione di basilari competenze informatiche la stanno rendendo una pratica sempre più diffusa. Moxie d'altronde non può dire che la gente VUOLE il controllo sui server, semplicemente perché contraddirrebbe il proprio business model. Agli altri dovrebbe essere chiaro che non saranno il web3, la blockchain o le AI[1] a liberare la società cibernetica in cui viviamo. E' vero: dobbiamo cambiare la nostra relazione con la tecnologia. Dobbiamo mettere tutti i cittadini in condizione di programmare e debuggare il software che utilizzano. Proprio come hanno imparato a leggere e scrivere. Giacomo [1] sotto l'ombrello AI rientrano molte tecnologie effettivamente molto diverse dalla blockchain perché in effetti... funzionano. Nel caso delle AI a livello implementativo il problema è CHI ne trae vantaggio e CHI ne viene danneggiato. Tuttavia le AI condividono con la blockchain, bitcoin e le altre criptoMENATE un singolo aspetto qui rilevante: la narrazione salvifica che fa leva solo sull'ignoranza informatica diffusa.