Security or Surveillance? By Bruce Schneier <https://www.lawfareblog.com/contributors/bschneier> Monday, February 1, 2016, 1:01 PM /Harvard’s Berkman Center for Internet & Society convened an interdisciplinary group to take on vexing questions of surveillance and cybersecurity. The group has now released the report “Don’t Panic <https://cyber.law.harvard.edu/pubrelease/dont-panic/>.” Here, its authors share some individual reflections./ *** Both the “going dark” metaphor <https://www.fbi.gov/news/speeches/going-dark-are-technology-privacy-and-publ...> of FBI Director James Comey and the contrasting “golden age of surveillance” metaphor <https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/07-08-15%20Swire%20Testimony....> of privacy law professor Peter Swire focus on the value of data to law enforcement. As framed in the media, encryption debates are about whether law enforcement should have surreptitious access to data, or whether companies should be allowed to provide strong encryption to their customers. It’s a myopic framing that focuses only on one threat — criminals, including domestic terrorists — and the demands of law enforcement and national intelligence. This obscures the most important aspects of the encryption issue: the security it provides against a much wider variety of threats. […] Continua qui: https://www.lawfareblog.com/security-or-surveillance