non capisco la questione  dataset riseptto alla distillazione
puoi espandere, per piacere ?

On 30/01/25 20:53, GC F wrote:
> Immagino si lamentino di violazione di segreti industriali (teoricamente
> il dataset può essere oggetto di protezione da SI) e competizione
> sleale, non di violazione dei diritti autoriali di cui invece si è
> discusso molto finora.
>
> Giancarlo
>
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 7:14 AM J.C. DE MARTIN
> <juancarlos.demartin@polito.it <mailto:juancarlos.demartin@polito.it>>
> wrote:
>
>     __
>     *OpenAI Furious DeepSeek Might Have Stolen All the Data OpenAI Stole
>     From Us*
>
>     /OpenAI shocked that an AI company would train on someone else's
>     data without permission or compensation./
>
>     Jason Koebler
>
>     Jan 29, 2025 at 9:43 AM
>
>     The narrative that OpenAI, Microsoft, and freshly minted White House
>     “AI czar” David Sacks are now pushing to explain why DeepSeek was
>     able to create a large language model that outpaces OpenAI’s while
>     spending orders of magnitude less money and using older chips is
>     that DeepSeek used OpenAI’s data unfairly and without compensation.
>     Sound familiar?
>
>     Both Bloomberg and the Financial Times are reporting that Microsoft
>     and OpenAI have been probing whether DeepSeek improperly trained the
>     R1 model that is taking the AI world by storm on the outputs of
>     OpenAI models.
>
>     [...]
>
>     continua qui: https://www.404media.co/openai-furious-deepseek-might-
>     have-stolen-all-the-data-openai-stole-from-us/ <https://
>     www.404media.co/openai-furious-deepseek-might-have-stolen-all-the-
>     data-openai-stole-from-us/>
>

--
You can reach me on Signal: @quinta.01 (no Whatsapp, no Telegram)