Le 26/01/2011 08:54, Andrea Glorioso a écrit :
On 1/25/2011 8:43 PM, J.C. DE MARTIN wrote:
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: [A2k] (ACTA) Certainly, the professors should know better Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 19:14:39 +0100 (CET) From: Ante <ante@ffii.org> To: a2k discuss list <a2k@lists.keionline.org>
David Hammerstein mentioned that the US does not regard ACTA as a treaty, that ACTA will bind the EU, not the US. Mr Velasco Martins said that under the Geneva Convention (that is what I wrote down) ACTA is a treaty and the US is bound by it. He probably meant the Vienna Convention (and possibly also said that). Note that the US did not ratify the Vienna Convention on the law of Treaties. Hammersteins remarks still stand.
Questa non l'ho capita.. secondo gli USA, cosa sarebbe ACTA? Un gentleman agreement?
When justifying, in response to questions, the fact that ACTA was considered an "executive agreement" (not calling for Congress involvement), USTR said it would not be binding for changes to US law. Philippe
Ciao,
Andrea