Ecco il mio contributo, proporrei questi testi e articoli: 1. Commons / pubblico dominio Boldrin Michele & Levine David K., Against Intellectual Monopoly ( http://www.dklevine.com/general/intellectual/againstnew.htm ) (Cambridge University Press 2008), http://www.dklevine.com/general/intellectual/againstnew.htm; Boyle James, The ( http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=470983 ) Opposite of Property, 66 law & contemp. Prob. 1 (2003), http://www.law.duke.edu/boylesite/; Boyle James, The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain ( http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=470983 ), 66 law & contemp. Prob. 33 (2003), http://www.law.duke.edu/boylesite/; Cohen Julie, Copyright, Commodification, and Culture: Locating the Public Domain, in The Future of the Public Domain: Identifying the Commons in the Information Law121-66 (Lucie Guibault & P. Bernt Hugenholtz eds., Kluwer Law International 2006); Cultural Environmentalism @ 10 (James Boyle & Lawrence Lessig eds.), 70 law & contemp. Prob. 1-232 (2007), http://www.law.duke.edu/boylesite/; Hardin Garrett, The Tragedy of the Commons, 162 Science 1243 (1968); Heller Michael A., The Tragedy Of The Anticommons: Property In The Transition From Marx To Markets ( file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/TheGian/Local%20Settings/BIBLIOGRAPHY/Heller%20Michael%20A.,%20The%20Tragedy%20Of%20The%20Anticommons%20Property%20In%20The%20Transition%20From%20Marx%20To%20Markets,%20111%20HARV.%20L.%20REV.%20621%20(1998).pdf ), 111 Harv. L. Rev. 621 (1998); Lange David, Reimagining The Public Domain ( http://eprints.law.duke.edu/archive/00000825/ ), 66 Law & Contemp. Probs.463 ( about:....David, Reimagining The Public Domain, 66 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS. 463 (2003).pdf ) (2003); LorenLydia Pallas, Building A Reliable Semi-commons Of Creative Works: Enforcement Of Creative Commons Licenses And Limited Abandonment Of Copyright ( about:....Lydia Pallas, Building A Reliable Semicommons Of Creative Works - Enforcement Of Creative Commons Licenses And Limited Abandonment Of Copyright, 14 GEO. MASON L. REV. 271 (2007).pdf ), 14 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 271 (2007); Macmillan Fiona ( http://www.bbk.ac.uk/law/about/ft-academic/macmillan/publications ), Commodification and Cultural Ownership, inCopyright And Free Speech: Comparative And International Analyses 35-65 (Jonathan Griffiths and Uma Suthersanen eds., Oxford University Press 2003); Merges Robert P., A New Dynamism in the Public Domain ( about:....Robert P., A New Dynamism in the Public Domain, 71 CHI. L. REV. 183 (2004).pdf ), 71 Chi. L. Rev. 183 (2004); Netanel Neil W., Copyright’s Paradox ( http://books.google.com/books?id=vo9G-0iZNQIC )(Oxford University Press 2008); Samuelson Pamela, Enriching Discourse on Public Domain ( about:....Pamela, Enriching Discourse on Public Domain, 55 DUKE L. J. 783 (2006).pdf ), 55 Duke L. J. 783 ( http://www.ischool.berkeley.edu/~pam/papers/enriching%20discourse%20on%20pub... ) (2006); Samuelson Pamela, The Public Domain - Mapping the Digital Public Domain - Threats and Opportunities, 66 law & contemp. Prob. 147 (2003) Vaidhyanathan Siva, Copyrights and Copywrongs: The Rise of Intellectual Property and How It Threatens Creativity ( http://books.google.com/books?id=sGjSY0rRC_wC )(New York University Press 2003); Van Schijndel Marieke and Joost Smiers, Imagining a World Without Copyright: the Market and Temporary Protection, a Better Alternative for Artists and Public Domain, in Copyright and Other Fairy Tales: Hans Christian Andersen and the Commodification of Creativity ( http://books.google.com/books?id=uKJe-oKumjEC ) 129 (Helle Porsdam ed., Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. 2006). 2. Commons e cyberlaw Barlow John Perry, The Economy of Ideas: A Framework for Patents and Copyrights in the Digital Age (Everything You Know About Intellectual Property is Wrong), Wired 2.03, 1994, www.wired.com/wired/archive/2.03/economy.ideas.html; ( http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/2.03/economy.ideas.html; ) Boyle James, Shamans, Software & Spleens: Law and the Construction of The Information Society(Harvard University Press 1996); Clark Charles, The Future of the Copyright in a Digital Environment 139-146 (P. Bernt Hugenhotltz ed., Kluwer Law International 1996); Cohen Julie,A Right to Read Anonymously: A Closer Look at Copyright Management in Cyberspace, 28 Conn. L. R. 981 (1996); Elkin-Koren Niva, It'sAllAbout Control: Rethinking Copyright in the New Information Landscape, in The Commodification of Information 79-106 (Niva Elkin-Koren & Neil W. Netanel eds., 2002); Jenkins Henry,Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide (New York University Press 2008); KuRaymond S. R., Consumers And Creative Destruction: Fair Use Beyond Market Failure, 18 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 539 (2003); KuRaymond S. R., The Creative Destruction of Copyrights: Napster and the New Economics of Digital Technology, 69 u. Chi. L. Rev. 263(2002); Litman Jessica, Sharing and Stealing, 27 Hastings Comm. & Ent. L.J. 1 (2004); Litman Jessica, Digital Copyright(Prometheus Books 2001); National Research Board, The Digital Dilemma: Intellectual Property in The Information Age (National Academy Press, 2000); Von Lohmann Fred, Fair Use as Innovation Policy, 23 Berkeley Tech. L. J. 829 (2008) [American consumers increasingly take iPods, TiVos and similar private copying technologies for granted. Yet copyright law lacks a coherent account for this private, non-transformative copying. This article contends that copyright law's historical tolerance for such copying as a fair use has served as an important element of both copyright and innovation policy. This is because, to the extent it permits private copying, fair use creates incentives for technology companies to build innovative new products that enable such copying. Far from being an unfair "subsidy" from copyright owners to technology innovators, this aspect of fair use has yielded complementary technologies that enhance the value of copyrighted works. This fair use incentive to technology companies, moreover, is justified in light of a persistent market failure that would otherwise result in underproduction of certain kinds of socially-beneficial innovations. Finally, there are reasons to believe that technology innovators may not in many cases be able to appropriate to themselves the value of the fair uses that their technologies enable, because those uses will not be part of their marginal costs of production. To the extent that the value of these fair uses ends up being captured by the public, rather than technology innovators, this also furthers the purposes of copyright law.] 3. File-sharing Katyal Sonia K., Privacy vs. Piracy ( about:..Sonia K., Privacy vs. Piracy, 7 YALE J. LAW & TECH. 222 (2005).pdf ), 7 Yale J. Law & Tech. 222 (2005); Lemley Mark & Reese Anthony, Reducing Digital Copyright Infringement Without Restricting Innovation, 56 Stan. L. Rev. 1345 (May 2004); Liebowitz Stan, How Reliable is the Oberholzer-Gee and Strumpf Paper on File-Sharing? (University of Texas at Dallas, Working Paper, August 2007), available at http://copyrightalliance.net/files/ssrn-id1014399.pdf; Liebowitz Stan, File Sharing: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?, 49 J.L. & Econ. 1 (2006); Oberholzer-Gee Felix & Strumpf Koleman, The Effect Of File Sharing On Record Sales: An Empirical Analysis (University of North Carolina, Working Paper, June 2005), available at http://www.unc.edu/~cigar/papers/FileSharing_March2004.pdf ( http://www.unc.edu/~cigar/papers/FileSharing_March2004.pdf ). 4. Internet e Democrazia Benkler Yochai, Through the Looking Glass: Alice and Constitutional Foundations of the Public Domain, 66 J. Law & Contemp. Probs. 173 ( http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/lcp/articles/lcp66dWinterSpring2003p173.htm ) (2003); Benkler Yochai, Free as the Air to Common Use: First Amendment Constraints on the Enclosure of the Public Domain, 74 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 354 (1999); Lange David & Powell Jefferson H., No Law: Intellectual Property in the Image of an Absolute First Amendment ( http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/080474579X/ref=sib_dp_pt#reader-link ) (Stanford Law Books 2008), http://www.amazon.com/reader/080474579X?_encoding=UTF8&ref_=sib_dp_pt#reader...; Pollack Malla, A Listener’s Free Speech, A Reader’s Copyright, 35 Hofstra L. Rev. 1457 (2007); Samuelson Pamela, Copyright and Freedom of Expression in Historical Perspective, 10 J. Intell. Prop. L. 319 ( http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/intpl10&id=325&collection=guest&index=journals/intpl ) (2003); Shapiro Andrew L., The Control Revolution: How the Internet is Putting Individuals in Charge and Changing the World we Know(Public Affairs 1999); Suthersanen Uma, Towards An International Public Interest Rule? Human Rights And International Copyright Law, inCopyright And Free Speech: Comparative And International Analyses 35-65 (Jonathan Griffiths and Uma Suthersanen eds., Oxford University Press 2003); Torremans Paul, Is Copyright a Human Right? ( file:///E:/DUKE/IP%20SJD/DISSERTATION/PART%20I/5.%20THE%20SEARCH%20FOR%20CULTURAL%20DISTINCTIVENESS%20AS%20PARADIGM%20OF%20EQUALITY/Torremans%20Paul,%20Is%20Copyright%20a%20Human%20Right,%202007%20Mich.%20St.%20L.%20Rev.%20271%20(2007).pdf ), 2007 Mich. St. L. Rev. 271 (2007). Un saluto, Giancarlo
"J.C. DE MARTIN" <demartin@polito.it> 10/13/2009 2:13 AM >>> Buongiorno a tutti,
le letture consigliate NEXA che trovate qui http://nexa.polito.it/recommended-readings stanno crescendo, ma di sicuro restano ancora fuori libri e articoli fondamentali. Se volete segnalare libri e articoli che secondo voi non si possono non aver letto se si vuole parlare (o anche solo pensare) di un certo tema "internet & societa'", me lo segnalate per favore? Grazie, juan carlos _______________________________________________ nexa mailing list nexa@server-nexa.polito.it https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa