Higher education responses to COVID-19 in the United States:
Evidence for the impacts of university policy
Brennan Klein, Nicholas Generous, Matteo Chinazzi, Zarana
Bhadricha, Rishab Gunashekar, Preeti Kori, Bodian Li, Stefan
McCabe, Jon Green, David Lazer, Christopher R. Marsicano, Samuel
V. Scarpino, Alessandro Vespignani
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.07.21264419
This article is a preprint and has not been certified by peer
review [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research
that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide
clinical practice.
Abstract
With a dataset of testing and case counts from over 1,400
institutions of higher education (IHEs) in the United States, we
analyze the number of infections and deaths from SARS-CoV-2 in the
counties surrounding these IHEs during the Fall 2020 semester
(August to December, 2020). We used a matching procedure designed to
create groups of counties that are aligned along age, race, income,
population, and urban/rural categories—socio-demographic variables
that have been shown to be correlated with COVID-19 outcomes. We
find that counties with IHEs that remained primarily online
experienced fewer cases and deaths during the Fall 2020 semester;
whereas before and after the semester, these two groups had almost
identical COVID-19 incidence. Additionally, we see fewer deaths in
counties with IHEs that reported conducting any on-campus testing
compared to those that reported none. We complement the statistical
analysis with a case study of IHEs in Massachusetts—a rich data
state in our dataset—which further highlights the importance of
IHE-affiliated testing for the broader community. The results in
this work suggest that campus testing can itself be thought of as a
mitigation policy and that allocating additional resources to IHEs
to support efforts to regularly test students and staff would be
beneficial to mitigating the spread of COVID-19 in the general
population.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.10.07.21264419v1