Solving the Orphan
Works Problem for the United States
David R. Hansen
University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - School of
Law; University of California, Berkeley - School of Law
Kathryn Hashimoto
University of California, Berkeley - School of Law
Gwen Hinze
University of California, Berkeley - School of Law
Pamela Samuelson
University of California, Berkeley - School of Law
Jennifer M. Urban
University of California, Berkeley - School of Law
September 10, 2013
Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts,
Vol. 37, No. 1, 2013
Abstract:
Over the last decade, the problem of orphan
works — i.e., copyrighted works whose owners cannot be located
by a reasonably diligent search — has come sharply into focus
as libraries, archives, and other large repositories of
copyrighted works have sought to digitize and make available
their collections online. Although this problem is certainly
not limited to digital libraries, it has proven especially
challenging for these organizations because they hold diverse
collections that include millions of books, articles, letters,
photographs, home movies, films, and other types of works.
Many items come with a complex, unknown, and (often)
unknowable history of copyright ownership. Because U.S.
copyright law provides for both strong injunctive relief and
monetary damages (in the form of statutory damages of up to
$150,000 per work infringed), organizations that cannot obtain
permission often do not make their collections available at
all.
In October 2012, the U.S. Copyright Office initiated a new
study of orphan works and mass digitization, and has indicated
that it is a high-priority policy issue for the office. That
study, and the work that preceded it, has highlighted the wide
array of perspectives about why and how to address the orphan
works problem. In this article we present evidence that the
orphan works problem is very real and that it inhibits many
socially valuable uses of copyrighted works by libraries,
archives, museums and other memory institutions. We then
canvas the array of potential solutions, and ultimately
conclude that fair use, combined with the Copyright Office’s
remedy limitation approach, are better approaches for
addressing this problem in the United States than alternatives
proposed elsewhere. Finally, we explore future-looking
changes, such as the reintroduction of copyright formalities
and the development of registries, that would reduce the
number of orphan works in the future.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 56
Keywords: copyright, orphan works, digital
libraries, fair use, digitization, Google, HathiTrust
Accepted Paper Series