Piu' o meno per caso, mi è appena passato sotto agli occhi questo:

https://blog.opensource.org/the-ultimate-list-of-reactions-to-the-cyber-resilience-act/

"The European Commission’s proposed Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) as drafted may harm Open Source, and perhaps all other non-industrial software.
There were 131 responses to the proposed text that the Commission has sent to the Parliament, including one from the Open Source Initiative. Of those, 18 responses – representing a significant proportion of Europe’s software industry – shared OSI’s concerns to some degree. Here are some sample points from the responses"

...e poi seguono i testi (e i link) delle 18 entita' che condividono (e mettono nero-su-bianco) le perplessita' di OSI:

• Open Source Initiative (OSI)
• Open Forum Europe (OFE — with OSI, Eclipse, APELL, CNLL, OSBA)
  
• The Document Foundation (LibreOffice)
• Vrijschrift.org
• NLNet Labs (with CZ.NIC, ISC, NetDEF)
• Developers Alliance
• RIPE NCC
• ITI – Information Technology Industry Council
• DIGITALEUROPE
• Japan Business Council in Europe (JBCE)
• Bitkom
• Eco
• OpenSSF (Linux Foundation)
• OpenXchange
• GitHub
• Huawei
• Microsoft
• Sonatype

Magari, assemblare qualcosa di simile, rispetto ai discorsi di stamane (su IA/ChatGPT e dintorni), dove nei punti elenco ci sono (almeno) i vari contributori di questa lista.... potrebbe essere qualcosa di interessante

Bye,
DV

-- 
Damiano Verzulli
e-mail: damiano@verzulli.it
---
possible?ok:while(!possible){open_mindedness++}
---
"...I realized that free software would not generate the kind of
income that was needed. Maybe in USA or Europe, you may be able
to get a well paying job as a free software developer, but not
here [in Africa]..." -- Guido Sohne - 1973-2008
   http://ole.kenic.or.ke/pipermail/skunkworks/2008-April/005989.html