Confesso che la considerazione: This means that Member States wishing to easily delegate such activity to an administration should re-think their plans (this is for instance the case of the Italian copyright enforcement reform) mi pare un poco forzata. Vi sono nelle considerazioni dellAvvocato Generale alcuni passaggi utili per argomentare contro AGCOM ( ma per questo basta leggere le norme...), ma la deduzione riportata nel Blog citato da Stefano, ad esser intellettualmente onesti, mi pare eccessiva. C. -----Messaggio originale----- Da: nexa-bounces@server-nexa.polito.it [mailto:nexa-bounces@server-nexa.polito.it] Per conto di Stefano Quintarelli Inviato: martedì 26 novembre 2013 14.05 A: A Dicorinto; oreste.pollicino Cc: nexa; nexa-bounces; nexa-request Oggetto: Re: [nexa] ISP e diritto d'autore (conclusioni C-314/12) http://is.gd/tBcdQy - the Attorney General stresses that fact that web-blocking is subject to law reservation and should be pursued and reviewed by courts. This means that Member States wishing to easily delegate such activity to an administration should re-think their plans (this is for instance the case of the Italian copyright enforcement reform); - since important rights like freedom of speech, privacy, freedom of business ecc must be guaranteed, some national judges my come to the conclusions, in the concrete circumstances, that web-blocking is an excessive and inadequate measure; I believe that DPI (deep packet inspection) will not be tolerated by national courts; - courts can neither impose general web-blocking measures nor an result obligation: in other words, the web-blocking decision should specifically indicate the technological measures to be undertaken, it cannot consist in a just an order to block access to a certain website, leaving to the ISPs the liability about the effectiviness of the adopted measure. ciao, s. On 26/11/2013 13:45, A Dicorinto wrote:
Oh, yeah!
http://www.repubblica.it/tecnologia/2013/11/26/news/provider_chiusura_sito-7 1981938/?ref=HREC1-6
2013/11/26 oreste.pollicino <oreste.pollicino@unibocconi.it>
According to Advocate General Cruz Villalón an internet provider can be
required to
block access by its customers to a website which infringes copyright
Such a court injunction must refer to specific blocking measures and
achieve an appropriate
balance between the opposing interests which are protected by fundamental
rights
continua qui
http://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2013-11/cp130149en.p df
_______________________________________________
nexa mailing list
nexa@server-nexa.polito.it
_______________________________________________
nexa mailing list
nexa@server-nexa.polito.it
-- conf room: http://quinta.quivideo.it blog: http://blog.quintarelli.it tumblr: http://stefanoquintarelli.tumblr.com bitmessage id: BM-2DC6u7NoBoBwSEzX7C8iPjJNrAmZT5s3ms _______________________________________________ nexa mailing list nexa@server-nexa.polito.it https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa