Buongiorno Ejona,

Ejona Xhemalaj <ejona.xhemalaj@unito.it> writes:

[...]

> Vi segnalo che *giovedì 17 febbraio 2022, dalle ore 15.00 alle ore 17.00*,
>
> avrà luogo online il seminario *"Algorithmic IP Enforcement Online"*.
>
> Relatore: Prof. *Giancarlo Frosio* (Professore al Queen's University
> Belfast; Stanford University; Université de Strasbourg – CEIPI).
>
> Discussant: Dott.ssa *Ejona Xhemalaj* (Dottoranda in Diritto, Persona e
> Mercato presso l'Università degli Studi di Torino).

grazie mille della segnalazione, avrei due domande:

1. non potrò partecipare ma sarei interessato a sentire cosa viene detto
nel seminario: per favore sarà disponibile una registrazione
dell'evento?

2. i temi sviluppati nel seminario sono quelli illustrati nel Marzo 2020
dal Prof. Frosio in questo paper?

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346752901_Algorithmic_Enforcement_Online

«Algorithmic Enforcement Online»

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly and pervasively affecting
society. AI and algorithms play a relevant role in the Intellectual
Property (IP) discourse as well. Tomorrow, algorithms will of course
come as creators and innovators but today they are already here as
enforcers. Content sanitization online will soon — and inevitably —
become the sole domain of algorithmic enforcement tools. This process
towards algorithmic enforcement online has been characterized by a few
important recent developments. First, emerging regulatory framework, new
legislative obligations and judicial trends would like to force online
intermediaries to implement architectural changes leading to
sanitization of allegedly infringing content — possibly legit freedom of
expression — by design. Second, as a consequence, algorithmic
enforcement brings about privatization of enforcement and delegation of
public authority. Third, in online enforcement of intellectual property
— as well as any other content sanitization — algorithms take decisions
reflecting policy’s assumptions and interests that have very significant
consequences to society at large, yet there is limited understanding of
these processes. Finally, but critically for the focus of this
investigation, Online Service Providers’ (OSPs) regulatory choices —
occurring through algorithmic tools — can affect profoundly enjoyment of
users’ fundamental rights, such as freedom of expression, freedom of
information and right to privacy and data protection. This Chapter will
map the complex conundrum triggered by algorithmic enforcement in the IP
domain with special emphasis on copyright and trademark enforcement
online. In doing so, this chapter, first, briefly explains what
algorithmic enforcement online actually is. Second, this chapter will
dig into voluntary, judicial and legislative measures that have been
promoting the emergence of algorithmic enforcement online. Third, this
chapter will assess tensions between algorithmic enforcement and human
rights, including due process, freedom of information, freedom
expression, privacy and freedom of business. In conclusion, this chapter
will discuss solutions for protecting human rights from algorithmic
enforcement negative externalities.

--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

[...]

cordiali saluti, 380°

--
380° (Giovanni Biscuolo public alter ego)

«Noi, incompetenti come siamo,
 non abbiamo alcun titolo per suggerire alcunché»

Disinformation flourishes because many people care deeply about injustice
but very few check the facts.  Ask me about <https://stallmansupport.org>.