| Subject: | [open-government] World's First Rating of Right to Information |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 29 Sep 2011 07:29:39 +0200 |
| From: | Helen Darbishire <helen@access-info.org> |
| To: | <euopendata@lists.okfn.org>, <open-government@lists.okfn.org> |

Press
Release
For immediate
release
Worldâs
First Rating of Right to Information: 89 Countries Ranked
28
September 2011, Madrid/Halifax - On International Right
to Know Day, two leading human rights organisations, Access
Info Europe (Spain) and the Centre for Law and Democracy
(Canada), are launching the first detailed analysis of the
legal framework for the right to information (RTI) in 89
countries around the world.
The RTI Rating is based
on 61 Indicators drawn from a wide range of international
standards on the right to information, feedback from an
international Advisory Council of renowned experts on the
right to information and comparative study of numerous right
to information and related laws from around the world.
The findings
of the RTI Rating show that there is a significant variety in
the quality of the legal framework, with scores out of a
maximum possible 150 ranging from 37 (Germany) to 135
(Serbia). Some of the key results:
» More recent laws protect
the right to know more strongly; of the 20 countries with
scores above 100, 11 adopted their RTI laws since 2005, and 7
since 2000 â these laws tend to have much stronger
oversight, enforcement and promotion.
» Of the 20 countries with
scores above 100, 7 are in East and Central Europe, 5 in Asia,
4 in the Americas, 3 in Africa and only one is in Western
Europe;
» Europe overall accounts
for 15 of the bottom 20, primarily the older European laws
which are more limited in scope and have weaker appeals
mechanisms;
âEffective
protection of human rights like the right to information
requires a sound legal basis,â said Toby Mendel,
Executive Director of the Centre for Law and Democracy. âThis
rating tool enables us to pinpoint areas of weakness in
the legal framework for RTI, and to direct future advocacy
at resolving these.â
The RTI Rating
shows not only a countryâs overall score, but also but also
its strengths and weaknesses in relation to seven main
categories: Right of Access, Scope; Requesting Procedures;
Exceptions and Refusals; Appeals; Sanctions and Protections;
and Promotional Measures.
The score for
the legal framework did not always accord with overall levels
of transparency in a country in practice. Some national
experts who reviewed the AIE and CLD country assessments noted
that is sometimes a gap between the quality of the law and the
practice. In some northern European countries, the older legal
frameworks do not fully reflect the culture of transparency in
practice, whereas in countries like Azerbaijan, Nepal and
Ethiopia, strong laws on paper do not necessarily reflect a
fully open society; the strong laws in El Salvador and Liberia
were adopted too recently to assess the practice.
âTesting
of levels of transparency in practice is essential to have a
full picture,â commented Helen
Darbishire, Executive Director of Access Info Europe. âAdopting
a law is only a first step to transparency; without
accurate measures of access to information in practice,
governments can participate in âtransparency washingâ
and claim greater respect for this fundamental human right
than is in fact the case.â
Note
for editors
· More information about
the tools used in preparing the RTI Rating, the Advisory
Committee and the detailed ratings for each country can be
found at: www.rti-rating.org.
· Access Info Europe and
the Centre for Law and Democracy remain open to comments and
corrections to the RTI Rating. We know that only through
expert feedback will we perfect this analysis. The following
countries have not yet had national reviewers and comments
from experts knowing about those countries would be
particularly welcome: Antigua and Barbuda, Austria,
Bangladesh, Cook Islands, Denmark, Dominican Republic,
Ecuador, Estonia, Greece, Guatemala, Guinea-Conakry, Iceland,
Korea (South), Kosovo, Liechtenstein, Montenegro, Nicaragua,
Panama, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, St Vincent and the
Grenadines, Switzerland, Tajikistan, Trinidad and Tobago,
Tunisia and Turkey.
For
further information please contact:
Helen
Darbishire, Access Info Europe
www.access-info.org
Email: helen@access-info.org |
+34 667 685 319
Michael
Karanicolas, Centre for Law and
Democracy
www.law-democracy.org
Email: michael@law-democracy.org
| +1 902 448 5290