The New Ambiguity of "Open
Government"
Harlan Yu
Princeton University - Center for Information Technology
Policy; Princeton University - Department of Computer Science
David G. Robinson
Information Society Project at Yale Law School
February 28, 2012
Abstract:
“Open government” used to carry a hard political edge: it
referred to politically sensitive disclosures of government
information. The phrase was first used in the 1950s, in the
debates leading up to passage of the Freedom of Information Act.
But over the last few years, that traditional meaning has
blurred, and has shifted toward technology.
Open technologies involve sharing data over the Internet, and
all kinds of governments can use them, for all kinds of reasons.
Recent public policies have stretched the label “open
government” to reach any public sector use of these
technologies. Thus, “open government data” might refer to data
that makes the government as a whole more open (that is, more
transparent), but might equally well refer to politically
neutral public sector disclosures that are easy to reuse, but
that may have nothing to do with public accountability. Today a
regime can call itself “open” if it builds the right kind of web
site—even if it does not become more accountable or transparent.
This shift in vocabulary makes it harder for policymakers and
activists to articulate clear priorities and make cogent
demands.
This essay proposes a more useful way for participants on all
sides to frame the debate: We separate the politics of open
government from the technologies of open data. Technology can
make public information more adaptable, empowering third parties
to contribute in exciting new ways across many aspects of civic
life. But technological enhancements will not resolve debates
about the best priorities for civic life, and enhancements to
government services are no substitute for public accountability.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 24
Keywords: open government, open data,
transparency, adaptability, e-government, government 2.0,
Internet, executive branch
Working Paper Series