On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 18:27:07 PM +0200, Giuseppe Attardi wrote:
https://onezero.medium.com/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism-8135e6744d...
Se pensate sia TL:DR, leggete questa review:
In a nutshell, the author describes the source of the problem: an advertising-based revenue model that requires ever-increasing amounts of data, and thus ever-increasing concentration, coupled with weak anti-trust enforcement, and, worse, government actions that deliberately or inadvertently favor the power of dominant companies. The author describes (as have others) the negative effects this has had for privacy(which, as the author says, “is necessary for human progress”) and democracy; and proposes some solutions: strong antitrust, but also a relatively new idea – imposed interoperability.
Chi considera "relatively new" l'interoperabilita' o e' incompetente o e' ignorante. E' come andavano le cose ORIGINARIAMENTE. Quanto all'antitrust, strong o no, e' inutile in questo caso, e' incredibile quanto resista questa baggianata. Se un prodotto o servizio fa oggettivamente MALE, va proibito o limitato pesantemente in modi e per ragioni che con l'antitrust non c'entrano niente, non fatto offrire da N aziende anziche' una. Vale per il profiling per creare dipendenza come vale per tabacco, superalcolici, freni delle automobili e mille altre cose. Tutta roba gia' stranota ovviamente. Marco -- Help me to continue my digital awareness blogging: https://stop.zona-m.net/christmas-2020-fundraising/